Other groups, such as the FS group, which is represented by PAFSO, received different targeted measures to meet their specific needs, but the total value of these specific improvements was about 1% during the four years of their agreements. Through sound and good faith negotiations, the Canadian government has concluded 34 agreements during this round of negotiations, which include more than 65,000 employees of the federal public service. These include comparisons with 15 different negotiators representing 17 bargaining units within the CPA and 17 groups of workers in separate agencies. June 18, 2015 – The FB negotiating team sends a clear message that we will defend our right to free collective bargaining and oppose July 28, 2014 – And… Collective bargaining begins – doesn`t it? May 15, 2015 – Federal public service unions unite to defend the rights of collective agreements. The evidence presented in this letter does not indicate that the TC Group receives more than the model established in the 34 agreements reached during this round of negotiations. For similar periods, the Canadian government negotiated economic wage increases of 1.75 per cent per year, plus targeted wage measures of about 1 per cent over the life of the agreement, with 34 federal public service groups. The employer argues that there is no justification for extending the scope of this section. There are other types of leave that are already available to workers under the agreement that deals with what the PSAC proposes. The proposal of the bargaining representative is not included in any CPA collective agreement. By negotiating in good faith, the Canadian government has concluded 34 agreements during this round of negotiations, involving more than 65,000 federal public service employees. These include 17 agreements with 11 bargaining agents representing CPA workers and 17 agreements with four bargaining agents representing workers working in separate agencies, such as the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), the National Research Council (NRC) and the National Film Board (NFB).

The employer argues that the removal of the „majority of workers` agreement“ requirement at M25.08 (a) (iii) allows the GSC to align itself with industry schedules. This is not in line with the provisions of the main agreement on working time (Article 25). The only variable working time, and three-quarters are applied when an employee has to work more than 7.5 hours per day. In light of the measures already in the Department of Finance Classification Directive and in the collective agreement, the employer argues that the requirements proposed by the negotiator have been met. Table 1 presents collective agreement units with new collective agreements, union affiliation and population from March 2018. The employer therefore asks the Commission to include in its report the employer`s proposal for a four-year collective agreement, with an economic increase of 2%, 2%, 1.5% and 1.5% and 1% for group-specific economic measures.